About me: I'm a researcher broadly interested in economic theory.
I specialize in Game Theory, Information Economics, Mechanism Design, and Statistical Decision Theory.
I obtained my PhD in economics from Northwestern University in 2026.
I will be a Postdoctoral researcher hosted by Matthew Levy (LSE) and Balázs Szentes (HKU) at the London School of Economics from August 2026, where I will work on game-theoretical modeling for AI safety.
I enjoy reading about Math, Chemistry, Biomechanics, Geopolitics, and Philosophy.
My hobbies are hiking, cooking, swimming, and weightlifting (the sport).
Every act of creation is a rebellion against the absurd.
— Albert Camus
My broad research interest is in Microeconomic Theory. My research agenda is two-pronged.
First, I am interested in developing modeling and mathematical tools that allow us to study
economically relevant problems. Second, I am keen to use these tools to answer concrete
questions about markets, institutions, and decision-making.
I specialize in studying information as both an incentive device and as a commodity.
We study the design of mechanisms by an intermediary that generates information for a sender
to persuade a receiver about an unknown attribute of the sender. The sender is initially privately,
but imperfectly, informed about her attribute, and the receiver takes an action based on posterior
beliefs about the sender’s attribute and the sender’s belief about the attribute. The mechanism
generates information for the sender and also controls its disclosure to the receiver. The design
of the optimal mechanism needs to screen the privately informed sender and thus confronts
incentive-compatibility constraints. The mechanism also deals with obedience constraints, as the
intermediary must generate just enough information to persuade the receiver. We characterize
incentive-compatible mechanisms for a wide class of problems when the sender contracts with the
intermediary. We use this characterization to study profit-maximizing mechanisms in three
applications: the design of college-admissions tests, the optimal use of consumer data on a digital
market platform, and the optimal design of credit rating schemes.
This paper develops a theory of employer competition over hiring standards in labor markets
where employers rely on third-party certification to screen applicants. A revenue-maximizing
certifier sells tests to an applicant, who possesses imperfect private information about his ability
and seeks to persuade employers to offer him employment. The certifier faces a joint screening
and information design problem in designing a test allocation. The distortions from screening
reduce the overall informativeness of the test allocation, steering the applicant supply towards
less selective employers. This incentivizes the more selective employers to lower their standards,
intensifying employer competition.
We study efficient and consumer-surplus maximizing information policies in a bilateral trade setting
where the buyer is initially privately imperfectly informed about his willingness to pay. We identify
a canonical class of demand functions that can be implemented by information disclosures that are
targeted based on the buyer’s initial private information. As an application we show that providing
more information to the buyer can lead to higher market prices and a lower trade probability without
affecting the consumer or producer surplus.
A sender with private information (high or low ability) tries to convince a receiver of having higher
ability. A certifier offers a menu of Blackwell experiments and prices to screen the sender. The sender
uses the experiment’s outcome to persuade the receiver to take a favorable action. This paper focuses on
the equilibrium interaction in this certification game when the receiver can distinguish between outcomes
of the experiment based on the hard information contained in the outcome. With binary ability, for a given
experiment, the hard information of an outcome is the likelihood ratio of that outcome. The main result
characterizes all possible equilibrium outcomes in terms of a convex combination of menus containing only
simple experiments. Using this characterization, I show the existence of an equilibrium in which soft
information overrules hard information; due to equilibrium self-selection of the sender, some outcomes
whose hard information makes the receiver more pessimistic about the sender's ability end up persuading
the receiver to choose the favorable action.
In this note, I describe how information can act both as a substitute and a complement when a decision
maker anticipates receiving more information in the future.